<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Specifying the kernel booting modules loading order</title>
	<link>http://www.yasker.org/en/blog/specifying-the-kernel-modules-loading-order-36</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 04:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: yasker</title>
		<link>http://www.yasker.org/en/blog/specifying-the-kernel-modules-loading-order-36#comment-580</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yasker.org/en/blog/specifying-the-kernel-modules-loading-order-36#comment-580</guid>
					<description>en...

I am thinking of why modconf can load some dependent modules... I checked the help of this option in kernel building, and it seems like modprobe dependent on this option. But the modconf? I don't know why...

Anyway, not make this option enable is curious... I may check the detail later...

Thanks for idea. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>en&#8230;</p>
<p>I am thinking of why modconf can load some dependent modules&#8230; I checked the help of this option in kernel building, and it seems like modprobe dependent on this option. But the modconf? I don&#8217;t know why&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyway, not make this option enable is curious&#8230; I may check the detail later&#8230;</p>
<p>Thanks for idea. <img src='http://www.yasker.org/en/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> 
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jascha</title>
		<link>http://www.yasker.org/en/blog/specifying-the-kernel-modules-loading-order-36#comment-545</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yasker.org/en/blog/specifying-the-kernel-modules-loading-order-36#comment-545</guid>
					<description>I think there is a diffrence between &quot;automatic module loading&quot; and the loading by dependencies while loading.

so if mod a depends on mod b, mod b gets loaded before mod a is loaded.

but these modules here require an other module (or a function from it) after it is loaded, you need this option.

could that be? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there is a diffrence between &#8220;automatic module loading&#8221; and the loading by dependencies while loading.</p>
<p>so if mod a depends on mod b, mod b gets loaded before mod a is loaded.</p>
<p>but these modules here require an other module (or a function from it) after it is loaded, you need this option.</p>
<p>could that be? <img src='http://www.yasker.org/en/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> 
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: yasker</title>
		<link>http://www.yasker.org/en/blog/specifying-the-kernel-modules-loading-order-36#comment-451</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 15:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yasker.org/en/blog/specifying-the-kernel-modules-loading-order-36#comment-451</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you very much! I did found that I miss the automatic module loading when compiling my kernel. It seems so silly for me to try load the modules manually....&lt;br/&gt;
But I am a little puzzle... The automatic module loading is off, but why the other modules can be load automatically...
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much! I did found that I miss the automatic module loading when compiling my kernel. It seems so silly for me to try load the modules manually&#8230;.<br/><br />
But I am a little puzzle&#8230; The automatic module loading is off, but why the other modules can be load automatically&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.yasker.org/en/blog/specifying-the-kernel-modules-loading-order-36#comment-446</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 23:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yasker.org/en/blog/specifying-the-kernel-modules-loading-order-36#comment-446</guid>
					<description>I've found that if you recompile the kernel with automatic module loading, then recompile the madwifi modules against that kernel you will solve the issue of &quot;no support for automatic module loading&quot;. Just recompiling the kernel with this option and not the madwifi modules causes the same issue, you'll need to recompile both. Hope this helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve found that if you recompile the kernel with automatic module loading, then recompile the madwifi modules against that kernel you will solve the issue of &#8220;no support for automatic module loading&#8221;. Just recompiling the kernel with this option and not the madwifi modules causes the same issue, you&#8217;ll need to recompile both. Hope this helps.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
